tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12154887.post8122203818399439549..comments2024-01-02T23:42:42.632+00:00Comments on Bitter and Blue: Hull reactionDanny Pugsleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14426646073355525430noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12154887.post-38751500117873919142009-11-29T11:32:38.012+00:002009-11-29T11:32:38.012+00:00to be honest i have to agree with the posters here...to be honest i have to agree with the posters here. I think people have the right to criticise Hughes, i watched the sunday sumpliment this morning aswell and think Hughes has to do alot more than he is currently doing. What i find the most dissapointing, is hughes has a negative influence on games. The subs he make or usually just man for man and not a tacticall change. We dont adjust our shape or spring any tactical suprises. Bringing on bellamy on the left is completley ineffective. He cant cross, or run at defenders, he's best through the middle, using his pace. Santa cruz is solid player, not mobile and requires balls into the box, odd then to use him, if we have no one can cross. It was just last match. IT happened at fulham and burnley. We left ourselves open with predicatable changes rather than securing a result. <br /><br />I deeply worry for a manager who appears to have no understanding or appear to be learning from his errors. I'm not convinced we are on the right track. <br /><br />I dont see Hughes being sacked at all, but it doesnt stop me expressing my dissent. I read the norfstander, and i agree to some extent, i read through MEN, bluemoon and there is plenty of Hughes out's with out reasoning or justification. <br /><br />But well, i set my cards out on Hughes from an early stage and i havnt changed my opinion or been convinced otherwise from his performance.<br /><br />I dont think he will be here come next season!newsoftheblueshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11872709077045599500noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12154887.post-20217466417547319042009-11-29T11:15:35.915+00:002009-11-29T11:15:35.915+00:00i think martin samuel hit the nail on the head rat...i think martin samuel hit the nail on the head rather than rather insulting self important article form norfstander which is more about him dismissing other opinions rather than really forming one for himself, there is a very good comment below on his site, which is far better.<br /><br />This run will be definded by how it ends. If we lose a few then it's a very bad run. if we win it's redeeming.<br /><br /><br />For their to be a bigger picture, you have to look at he man in charge and deem if he is capable of making us better rather than stagnate ...which we have done despite vast investment in a season and a half. In any business, with such investment, you look at your manager and asses if he is doing his job well. Is this just a bad run...or is there a more serious issue. Lack of motivation in the troops. a genuine lack of tactics and flexability. He has no idea about tempo or tactical development, too rigid and too predictable, so we are very easy to play against.<br /><br /><br />'I think it is clear that we are on the right path.'<br /><br />is it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12154887.post-86764334736466098002009-11-29T10:44:50.219+00:002009-11-29T10:44:50.219+00:0018 months and the best part of 200 million is enou...18 months and the best part of 200 million is enough of a chance. We had the best opportunity ever this season to kinck 4th and we have blown it under Hughes.Thorn in the Sidehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06457555077792275193noreply@blogger.com