Showing posts sorted by date for query kaka. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query kaka. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Sunday, August 09, 2009

Bitter and Blue interviews Ian Cheeseman

I recently had the opportunity to speak to Ian Cheeseman, who commentates on City for Radio Manchester ahead of the launch of his new book 'Best Job in The World: From Football Specials To The Press Box'.

For anyone who has caught his commentary, it is evident how much of a huge City fan he is (describing himself as a City 'idiot'), but it was only after interviewing him did I get a feel for how deep his passion and commitment for the club is. So much so, that he has missed just 30 games - home and away - in 32 years, this at the start of his time with Radio Manchester.

The book is essentially a life story and how he got to the position he is now in covering the team he loves, telling the story of his lifetime as a City fan to covering the side he loves. Far from being simply an autobiography though it encomposses elements of the job and being a fan, his life and times on the road covering City (and football) and some of the more unusual aspects and incidents he has encountered - all woven into a diary of the 2008/09 season, a season interesting enough in itself.

[Danny Pugsley] You are a lifelong blue. How did you end up supporting City?

[Ian Cheeseman] I suppose, like most supporters, I can't ever remember not supporting City. There were two people who probably had an influence, without ever realising. My next door neighbour and pal Kevan Barton was a very enthusiastic City fan, like me and I had an Uncle Bernard was a United fan, so there was plenty of banter between us. I lived in Radcliffe, half-way between Bury and Bolton, and my Dad worked in Manchester, so I always felt a closer connection to the Manchester, having been born there too.

You can over analyse these things, but I always felt City, as a club, was friendlier, didn’t take itself as seriously, lacked the arrogance of United and that the fans were more down to earth and had a sense of humour – and I prefer blue to red!

[DP] What are you’re greatest memories of City over the years. What are the highs and the lows?

[IC] I suppose the reality is that there have been more lows than highs. Relegation against Luton, the first I’d seen, was terrible – and going into the third division despite winning at Stoke. I’d rather concentrate on the highs though, like the 5-1 derby win, the 10-1 against Huddersfield complete with three hat-tricks and my first game against Schalke 04 in 1970. The truth is I have been obsessed with City since I was a teenager, and I’ve enjoyed every game, never regretting my fixation with the club. My passion for the Blues has led me into the media which has allowed me to meet so many interesting people, visit interesting places and map my working life around the team I support. There have been so many highs through the years, being part of the City family is probably the biggest highlight, as cheesy as that sounds – but then again that’s my nickname!

[DP] Who has been your favourite player throughout your time watching City?

[IC] Without doubt it is Colin Bell. As a young boy I admired all his attributes as a player, but also his shyness and his sense of fair play and honour. Most people will know that I helped Colin write his autobiography a couple of years ago, so I’ve become good friends with Colin, and he’s everything I thought he would be – loyal, modest and a true gentleman. There have been many others too, most of them tend to be the entertainers, currently it’s Robinho.

[DP] You are the voice of City on Radio Manchester, but how long have you been covering City?

[IC] I used to commentate on City’s club video, as a volunteer, and for a while did some of the games for “Clubcall”, a premium rate telephone service (before websites). I’ve been the on-pitch match day announcer at City, but in terms of the media that’s it, until I became the City man on GMR, now Radio Manchester, in 2001.

[DP] How did you get into the business, and what was your journey to get where you are know?

[IC] As I’ve explained, I was a fan – steward on the football specials – and did lots of voluntary stuff for hospital radio, supporters club, and indeed the football club, and through luck, being in the right place at the right time and I suppose a little bit of talent for the jobs, my media activities grew until I was offered the chance to be interviewed for a broadcast journalist job for the BBC. I was offered the job, left my “safe” job in a Bank(!) and have been a “professional” ever since. One of the reasons I decided to try writing a book, other than the Colin Bell book, was to explain that process more fully, as so many people have asked me that question through the years.

[DP] Who is a favourite interview of yours? I’d imagine Joey Barton was always good copy?!

[IC] Certainly the Joey Barton “rant” at Watford a few years ago was interesting! This might sound a bit “PR” but anyone who speaks truly and answers the questions is worth listening too. These days, most Premier League clubs restrict access to those you would want to interview and the players and managers are trained to say as little as possible. It’s a shame and I understand their point of view, because every word they utter is jumped on by the media, and as we all know, some media outlets are prone to exaggeration and sensationalism. These days the former players are more interesting to listen to and interview.

[DP] Onto the book, in a nutshell can you provide an overview of what we can expect from it?

[IC] It’s hard to explain briefly because it’s a bit “different”. People ask me what I do when I’m not covering City, and lots of questions about how I got into sports journalism, what it’s like behind the scenes etc so I’ve tried to answer those questions. I’ve written an account of one season in my working life, but through the pages of that diary/blog are stories about my 40 years watching football, mainly City but other clubs too. I’m a member of the 92 club, for example, so I’ve visited all 92 league grounds. There’s humour in there too, but I also hope people will get an insight into those areas that ask me about so frequently.

[DP] What gave you the idea or inspiration to write it? Was it a culmination of a number of years of following City?

[IC] I’ve always felt that my route into broadcasting is different to most people’s. My obsession with City has restricted my opportunities. Money is not everything to me and perhaps I’ve be doing something different or better paid now had I not been so determined to watch the Blues every week. I guess vanity has stopped me writing a book for a long time. Was I being too conceited to think I should write a book about myself and if I did who would read it? In the end I thought it would be fun and something my lads can keep as a record of what I was all about. It started after I did blogs for the BBC from City’s UEFA Cup trips last season. I enjoyed writing, I got a lot of positive feedback, loads of hits, so decided to try expanding things. The book is the end product and if no-one else likes it that’s fine, I still enjoyed writing it and it’s all true!

[DP] 2008/09 was a hell of a season to cover and base the book upon. Looking back, what were the best experiences you have from writing the book?

[IC] I’ve written about lots of things that didn’t happen last season, but you’re right, it was a fascinating season to use as the template for the book. The day the new owners took over – deadline day – was amazing, and it wasn’t even a match day. There was a new management team – on and off the field – and eight European trips, just to name a few things. Away from City Stockport County went into administration, Joe Royle was back at Oldham – briefly – and Bury and Rochdale were challenging for promotion and of course Droylsden’s FA Cup run and eventual expulsion from the competition. I loved it all, but found the trip to the Faroe Islands particularly interesting and there was Schalke v City – a head to head of my two favourite teams and getting to commentate on the game.

[DP] Any particular anecdotes or disasters that were encountered?

One of the incidents made me decide to write the book, as I considered if it was the right thing, came as I returned from Scunthorpe v Oldham on a rainy Tuesday night. It hadn’t been the best of games, and although each game sees me go off at a tangent to bring in various stories, I was wondering what on earth I would write about this game. Suddenly the front offside tyre of the car was driving exploded at 70mph. I reached the conclusion that all these dramas were happening for a reason! That day I decided I must write all this stuff down.

[DP] The recent spending spree seems to have inflated hopes of a top four finish again. What do you think the realistic prospects are for this season?

[IC] In view of the massive investment in players, I think City should finish in the top four and reach either the League Cup or FA Cup final – I don’t think that’s an unrealistic expectation. Since City fans have had relatively low levels of expectation during most of my time as a fan, it’ll be interesting to see how quickly my fellow fans go from being excited about qualifying for the Champions League to expecting to win it. One thing’s for sure, the club we all love so much is going to change beyond recognition – only time will tell if that’s for the better or the worse.

[DP] For me, the progress we have made is undeniable but I still feel we need that big name signing to ‘put us over the top’. Do you agree?

[IC] I agree, but it’s not easy persuading players to join the club at the start of this process. Having said that, I’ve been very disappointed to see Kaka move on this summer, after we were told he wouldn’t join City because his heart was with Milan – and he joined Madrid for less that City were going to pay. I'm also a bit worried about the injury records of some of the players we’ve signed or have been linked with.

[DP] What are your impressions of the owners? The changes since they took over appear to be all positive and my thoughts are that they have really sought to engage fans back to the club.

[IC] I’ve never met the owners, or the new Chairman, so I have no opinion other than as a fan. We’ve dreamed of a sugar-daddy forever and we’ve now got one. There are encouraging signs that they are trying to understand the club and their fans but actions will speak louder than words. I’m hopeful but have always warned, “Be Careful what you wish for”. It’s City at the top of the financial tree for now, so lets make hay while the sun shines, but how would we feel if this was happening to another club?

[DP] What are your thoughts of Mark Hughes? You are probably closer to him than most and I find it interesting how much he still splits the supporters.

[IC] It wouldn’t be right for me to express a strong view about Mark Hughes – I work with the club every week and interview the manager two or three times a week – and I would say that about any manager. Fred Eyre, Nigel Gleghorn and Paul Lake are there to give their opinions, so I’ll just re-state the obvious, there’s a lot of pressure on him to succeed now that he’s spent big and his introverted personality hasn’t yet made him a fans favourite. He seems a very sincere person and I wish him well.

[DP] What would be your preference – a top four finish or lifting a trophy?

[IC] I’d prefer to lift a trophy. I don’t like the mentality that has crept into football that finishing high in the league is more important that winning a cup. Surely one of the luxuries of having untold riches to spend on players is that earning more money from finishing higher in the league isn’t essential. Wining a trophy, even the League Cup, guarantees at least the Europa League and ends the 33/34 years without a trophy. I was at Wembley in 1976 and I can tell you it’s a great feeling. I also saw City finish 2nd in the First Division to Liverpool and winning the League Cup was better. I won’t ever allow the myth that higher in the league is better – certainly not for the fans.

[DP] Finally, can you give me your all-time City XI?

[IC] This is based on those I’ve seen play – not by reputation – and I have to say it’s very difficult. Joe Corrigan, Tony Book, Mike Doyle, Dave Watson, Willie Donachie, Mike Summerbee, Colin Bell, Ali Benarbia, Peter Barnes, Nicolas Anelka, Robinho. Subs: Glyn Pardoe, Dennis Tueart, Francis Lee, Rodney Marsh, Tony Coton, Paul Lake, Tommy Booth.

Many thanks to Ian for his time, and the book is now available at the City store or to order online, priced £9.99.

vote it up!

Monday, July 27, 2009

Terry says no

Finally, we can draw the whole pursuit (saga) around John Terry to a close.

The morning brought reports which suggested that a deal for Terry (plus moves for KoloToure and Joleon Lescott) would be concluded by the end of August, but this afternoon finally brought clarification from Terry that he would remain at Chelsea:

"I am totally committed to Chelsea and always have been," said Terry. "Chelsea have also made it clear to me consistently that there was never any intention to accept any kind of offer. When you are linked with any club, or with a manager [Mark Hughes] who I have huge respect for, it will always make headlines, but me leaving Chelsea was never a possibility.

"I know there has been comment that I should have made a statement earlier. However, throughout this period there have been numerous discussions between myself, the owner and the Chelsea board and we all agreed that the timing of any statement would suit everyone involved in those talks, not any outside influences or agendas. What is clear to me following those discussions is that Chelsea's ambition remains as high as ever."

Terry would clearly have strengthened an area of the side that does not reinforcing, and the drive and determination he possesses is an asset Hughes dearly craves in players, yet there was always something uncomfortable about the idea of Terry arriving at the club.

As big an asset as he could have been, he strikes as a fairly unpalatable character, and arguably, his best (or better at least) days are beginning to be behind him.

A move for either Toure or Lescott now seems likely, and both players would strengthen the defence, and would come in to the club with something to prove - an asset always worth having in a player.

The downside to Terry remaining at Chelsea of course is it still leaves us waiting to land the real big name the club hierachy sorely wants. Having been rebuffed by Kaka, Eto'o and now Terry - all world renowned players, it does mean that whilst being tempted, the upper echelon of players in the game will still be reticent about joining until we can break through and persuade that first real profile player of world stature to take the plunge.

vote it up!

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Hughes defends spending policy

"We understand how people may view us at a time in the world when times are hard for a lot of people and the economics of the world skew to a negative slant.

"But football sometimes bucks that trend, and we're in the business of trying to make our club better and we have to spend significant amounts of money to get significant players.

"That has never changed, irrespective of the economic situation in the world. We haven't had the benefit of Champions League money over a long period of time and we haven't had the success to generate the large amounts of money you need to build a squad that is capable of winning trophies."

>>telegraph.co.uk

Hughes hits the nail on the head here. The club have received continued critcism over the past few months for transfer bids, fees and wages paid and offered to players.

The sums of money that are being banded around may be astronomical, and indeed unpalatable, but from the clubs perspective it is something that at this stage in our progress is regarded as a necessary evil.

Whilst the club has a history, it does not have a recent one in terms of tangible success, so whlst there is a clear target in terms of what is being aimed at, it is at a distinct disadvantage in comparison to the top four and other top sides around Europe (something we saw with the efforts to sign Kaka).

Whereas the likes of Chelsea or Manchester United can offer competitive high end wages, they also have the recent success in terms of trophies and Champions League qualification that we are unable to. Instead, we have a vision that can be offered, and whilst it is an ambitious and impressive one (which Gareth Barry was clearly sold on) for us to compete at this stage with the likes of the top four we are going to have to offer above and beyond the 'going rate' in terms of wages.

The idea being that you can then secure top calibre players to get to the Champions League and win trophies. Then, and only then, can you entice players with the lure of trophies, medals and Champions League football needed to take the club on even further.

vote it up!

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Et tu, Samuel?

Earlier today saw the press conference from the representatives of Samuel Eto'o, in which his future would supposedly be clarified. However, far from clearing up his current situation, we are left with more questions than we had at this stage yesterday.

To summarise today's events, we are left with the following potential scenarios:

Eto'o will stay at Barcelona and see out the final year of his contract:

However, Eto’o has one season of his present contract left to run and, rather than accept the riches on offer at City, he is preparing to see out the final year before leaving Barcelona for nothing next summer.
A move to ourselves could still be agreed:

"The club said coach Pep Guardiola did not want him. Guardiola has not told the player he is not required."If they have a serious offer from Man City and if they want to continue with this negotiation we could be interested."We haven't spoken to City but if Barca have reached an agreement it shouldn't be that difficult to reach a deal."

He would prefer to stay at Barca, but would be happy to join us if they wish to see him leave:
"I don't know if they really want Samuel to stay of if they just want to make money out of him. He would be delighted to stay if they want him and we will study their offer if it is serious, but if they don't want him we will do all we can to help Samuel find a new club. In theory he wanted to play in the Champions League, but if Manchester City have an offer accepted, we would be delighted to go there."
All clear?

The club have of course offered no comment regarding any move for Eto'o. Perhaps this is as a result of being stung in the same way following the failed attempt for Kaka. Of course, this gives us no idea of the clubs intentions - whether there is a genuine interest, how close we may be/have been to signing Eto'o and what potential there is to signing him.

It does look doubtful at this stage, yet neither Barca or Eto'o have categorically ruled out a deal which could leave an avenue open for us. I don't see though that a deal is likely to be concluded any time soon, which will clearly be frustrating, and I don't see Hughes or Cook wanting to be kept hanging around in the hope of concluding the transfer.

vote it up!

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Club statement regarding Lionel Messi

MANCHESTER CITY Football Club note with interest the reports circulating in the Spanish media that the club has made an offer to the Barcelona player Lionel Messi and that he has turned down the chance to join the club.

While acknowledging that Lionel Messi is a world-class player of the highest calibre, Manchester City would like to make it clear that the club has at no time made an approach to Mr Messi or his representatives.

>>mcfc.co.uk

Expect plenty of rumour and denial this summer, but I imagine any transfer negotiations (expecially high profile ones) that do take place will be very low profile given the fall out from the failed Kaka bid.

vote it up!

Monday, February 02, 2009

January window recap

A relief in some respects now that the January window has been and gone.

During the month (and leading up to it I guess) we were very much the hot topic in the media, with plenty of negativity (jealousy?) surrounding us and our attempts at reinforcing the side. So much has been written and speculated that trying to keep up with everything going on was a tough task.

We arrived at the opening of the window in a state of flux, criticism of Hughes from fans and media alike growing and were soon dumped out of the FA Cup with a dismal performance at home to Nottingham Forest.

Despite some bumps along the way, what is clear is that we are in a far stronger position as bid adieu to January than we were at the beginning of 2009. The quartet who have been signed are of a similar disposition - solid internationals, experience at the top level but still with good years ahead of them.

In addition to the new arrivals, we also have three of our long term injured players in Michael Johnson, Valeri Bojinov and Martin Petrov on the way back, players we have clearly missed over the first half of the season and should provide a real strength in depth to the squad.

Who arrived?

Wayne Bridge, Nigel de Jong, Craig Bellamy and Shay Given arrived during January, and all four strengthen not only the squad, but the first choice eleven. Bridge, although culpable for two goals so far, is a better option than Javier Garrido, and most definitely an upgrade on Michael Ball. Nigel de Jong's impact will be two fold. Both as an impressive holding/defensive midfielder in his own right, but also in allowing Vincent Kompany to drop back and improve the central defensive area.

I wasn't overly enthused with the prospect of Bellamy the footballer arriving (let alone Bellamy the person), wondering how he would fit into the line-up, but having seen him in two games so far he does offer something different than the other forwards we have on the books. My misgivings about Shay Given have been well documented, but he is a good goalkeeper. Quite how good he is, and how much of an upgrade over Joe Hart he will be is something I will be keen to see, but if Hughes was intent on bringing in a 'keeper then unless we were going to splash £100 million on Gigi Buffon then Given is clearly the best option that we had.

Who didn't arrive?

Two big names - Kaka and Roque Santa Cruz, both of which ended frustratingly. The pursuit of Kaka was well documented with some of what was written about our attempt to sign him bordered on the disgraceful.

Perhaps we did make our approach for him too early in our 'project', but when you have an opportunity to sign arguably the best player in the world you cannot pass that up. Yes, it was always going to be a long shot, but one that was surely worth exploring.

Today's Roque Santa Cruz news was a microcosm of the whole pursuit of the player. The signing being off, then on, before falling through at the last. The reported fee of £25 million was way in excess of what his value is, but we are not operating in a normal market. We do need the player, and without an alternative being brought in run the risk of lacking the presence Hughes so desperately wants over the course of the season.

Seeing some of the deals that have been concluded, you do wonder though why both ourselves and Santa Cruz (given his desire to sign for us) weren't more forceful in pushing the signing through.

If Hughes is still keen on landing Santa Cruz in the summer though, Sam Allardyce and Blackburn could rue turning down the reported £20 million as I don't see them getting an offer anywhere near that figure in the future.

Without question though, this is now very much Hughes's side. The team is now made up of players he has either brought to the club or his type of player. His future is still unsettled though as the season so far has been a disappointment overall.

Heading into February, we are sat in mid-table and despite the talk of relegation for me that is not an issue. Looking up, we are five points off 7th position at present with FC Copenhagen in the UEFA Cup in a couple of weeks time.

The owners have shown a patient approach so far since taking over the club, and the January signings do point to being Hughes's ones as opposed to the marquee signings believed to be favoured by ownership.

Clearly questions remain at this point, and Hughes has a job on his hands to win over the many doubters amongst the fan base, and with no off-field distraction now the window has closed, focus will firmly be on what happens on the pitch.

Putting a positive spin on our current position though we do have an opportunity to ensure that the 2008/09 season ends up being a relatively succesful one.

For Hughes's long term future prospects, it may need to be.

vote it up!

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Thursday transfer round up - who we didn't get

Pretty much identical pieces in both The Guardian and Independent today, stating that prior to our failed bid for Kaka we went after several high profile players, including Thierry Henry, Gigi Buffon, David Villa and David Silva.

The constant theme with all of our interest appears to be the potential selling clubs hiking up the asking price knowing the limitless funds at our disposal.

From The Guardian:

Backed by their billionaire owners in Abu Dhabi, a delegation from Eastlands went to Valencia in December to make it known they wanted to sign Villa and his Spain team-mate David Silva from the La Liga club. City were willing to pay around £100m but pulled out, as a point of principle, when Valencia asked for £135m. "They wanted us to bankroll their club for the next four seasons," said one of the men involved in the deal.

A City delegation also travelled to Turin to open talks with Juvenus for Buffon, the Italy goalkeeper. Juventus wanted a figure close to £100m and, again, City withdrew from the negotiations, suspecting the Italian club were trying to take advantage of what has become known in football circles as "the Manchester City effect".

And The Independent:

The inflated financial demands that Manchester City have faced in their pursuit of players in this transfer window have forced them to walk away from three deals, with hopes of signing the Valencia duo David Villa and David Silva dashed, along with the pursuit of Lassana Diarra, who left Portsmouth for Real Madrid for £20m.

Regardless of whether we decided 'not to be anybody's fool' as Garry Cook put it, as shown with Kaka, I'm not convinced that we are quite able to pull off player recruitment of this calibre at this stage of our progress. Still, I don't think we deserve the criticism or derision that has come our way for these pursuits, and as Mark Hughes said, we should actually be applauded for aiming high.

Elsewhere, Robinho's recent escapade has brought rumours of his departure back to the forefront, with speculation that we could attempt to move for Didier Drogba (and others) in return. This has been dismissed already by Hughes, and I think this is a non-starter and more likely than not a piece of mischief making.

An interesting rumour that was in todays Mail linked Felipe Caicedo. Not a great amount of detail around the story but interesting that it is something we would consider given he moved up in the pecking order with a recent impressive spell in the line-up. Perhaps though, Hughes thinks he may be dispensable given the other options available to him and could get a decent return.

vote it up!

The days best City links 01/22/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

vote it up!

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Milan and Kaka hit back

There was an interesting piece in The Independent, which lifts a lid a little on some of the complexities behind the deal, and perhaps (from our standpoint at least) why the deal failed:

Cook's six-man delegation, including lawyers with expertise in intellectual property rights, had headed to Italy with high hopes. They knew they needed to sell their image rights ideas to Leite before they would manage to meet and convince Kaka himself. But that seemed unlikely from the moment they sat down. Attempting to establish whether Kaka's current deal with Adidas left any room for City to tie up image rights deals of their own and earn a return on their £91m investment, the club met a wall of resistance from Leite.

City told Leite of their ideas for a Kaka Foundation, through which his image would make money for a "humanitarian" cause. There was talk of lucrative digital TV and internet image rights deals. Privately, City were astonished that Kaka's current entire image rights income is believed to be €8m (£7.4m). In Cook's previous role with Nike, he was responsible for the international image rights of the basketball player Michael Jordan. They earn him $12m (£8.6m) a year for his signature alone. Football clubs have not touched the surface of such commercial opportunities.

But Leite would only talk about the player's personal terms. "They didn't want to get to the complexities and the sophistication," Cook said. "They just wanted an offer in cash terms." A brooding presence as the talks foundered was Galliani, in a side room nearby.

Getting nowhere as Monday night drew on, City suggested a period of reflection and shook on a plan to meet again in Milan today. Leite's desperation for a quick deal then led City to agree to bring that date forward 24 hours. A new day, they seem to have figured, offered hope of a change of heart. But after Cook and his delegation had left, the Italians decided they could not wait – and run the risk of City embarrassing them by unilaterally calling talks off. Cook was in the departure lounge of Milan's Linate Airport At 11.03pm, Italian time, when he received a phone call from Alberto Zilani, Leite's translator. "We want a cash offer now," Zilani said. Resigned to the fact that the deal was going nowhere, Cook called it off and both clubs formally announced the fact.

However, not so clear cut according to reports in the Italian press today, via this piece from The Mail:

'The truth is that in six hours of talks with Manchester City they only asked questions and didn't make an offer for Kaka.

'How on earth did they think they were going to buy him? It's one thing buying a property or a company but completely another when you are trying to charm one of the best players in the world.'

Gazzetta revealed that the negotiations had taken place in the law offices of Milan firm Izzi-Tognazzi and were stop start as City were constantly ''asking for time outs.''

Gazzetta said that Kaka's agent Bosco was getting fed up at the fact that City's Gary Cook and Simon Pierce were just asking questions primarily on the player's image rights.

Gazzetta also claimed that at 10pm on Monday night City, after ''consulting with the shaikh said they would make an offer via email the following day.''

Gazette wrote: ''At that point Bosco and AC Milan vice president Adriano Galliani looked at each other and asked to call off the talks. Cook tried to change direction but it was too late as Galliani had already called Silvio Berlusconi.'

The one worry I had with the fall out from the aborted deal, was how this would affect our ability to sign players of a similar standing to Kaka in the future.

The worry is that Cook's stinging remarks yesterday could turn out to be ill advised, given that surely Milan and Kaka's words are likely to hold more weight in the footballing world than Cook's argument that Milan were 'bottlers'.

Perhaps it would have been far wiser to have bitten his tongue and simply thanked Milan and Kaka for their interest and time during the negotiations, rather than to come across as a slightly inexperienced and naive negotiator with little idea of how to conclude a high profile transfer?

vote it up!

The days best City links 01/21/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

vote it up!

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Kaka - the fall out

The recriminations and mud slinging have begun today amidst the aftermath of end of negotiations to bring to Kaka to the club.

Perhaps borne out of frustration, or simply to get make a pre-emptive strike before the inevitable criticism, Garry Cook laid heavily into both Milan and representatives of Kaka (though not Kaka himself it has to be said) with some stinging comments:

“It’s a mixture of disappointment and some frustration too. I think the intention from AC Milan was clearly to sell their player and Manchester City’s intention was clearly to bring him to the football club.

“I think there was some political pressure and definitely media space that they engaged in. To be honest, I think they bottled it, simple as that.”

“It would have been great to have had Kaka at this football club, the Premier League would have benefitted, football would have benefitted and we were willing to make that investment on rational terms. Unfortunately, the behaviour that they showed was not what we had expected nor had we anticipated.”

“We’ve been to Milan four times and the delegation yesterday involved three lawyers that represent the legal counsel for Manchester City football club.

“It also involved a board member who had flown half way around the world from Abu Dhabi, myself and one other senior executive.

“We were confined to a room, with no food or drink, and we asked some questions of the football club and more importantly we asked some questions of the representatives of the player and they simple could not answer the questions.

“What they wanted to talk about was; ‘how much are you going to pay him?’We chose not to get into that and we didn’t make an offer to the player.

“Is he a great footballer? Yes. Does he represent all the values you would want to have as an ambassador of the sport global and were we looking for the opportunity to joint venture in areas that would take this club on to a different platform? Yes, but unfortunately the landscape changed and his representatives wanted to talk about how much we were going to pay him.

“Money was certainly the motive yesterday.”

A widely reported comment from Cook was that Milan 'bottled it', and whilst it made for a great byline, there is a definite truth within this as the fan reaction - whilst not a surprise - was quite vitriolic towards Adriano Galliani and Silvio Berlusconi, and whilst the reputed transfer figure of £100 million was needed by Milan, to effectively force a fan idol out of the club in return for the filthy lucre would have been a disastrous PR move and one that the Milan hierarchy, however costly, could not follow through with.

Kaka himself though believes it was more to do with divine intervention than anything else that led him to remaining in Milan:

'I believe I have made the right choice. To have gone to Manchester City could have been a great project but in the past few days I have prayed a lot to understand what the right team would be and in the end I have decided to remain here.

'I don't want anything else, I just want to be well and be happy in the place where people love me.

'From this story I have understood how people love me at Milan, the fans and my team-mates have helped me make this choice.'

None of us know quite how near or far from signing Kaka may have been, but given representatives of the club (let alone the manager) did not meet him - allied with Cook's comments - suggests it was not as close as we were led to believe by the media as a whole.

One theme that has been raised is the knock on effect this could have in our pursuit of other 'world stars', in that this could damage our aspirations of adding the very top players to the club. I don't necessarily subscribe to that view and would like to think Kaka's decision is very much a one off, in that it was solely motivated by the depth of his feeling for both Milan the football club and Milan the city, and however 'interesting' our 'project' was, a move to ourselves or any other club for that matter was not something he could contemplate at this stage of his life.

The whole issue does not reflect too well on ourselves, something evidenced given the level of feeling we have seen over the past week or so, and it has proved how difficult it is for us to conduct transfer business given the spotlight that has now very much fallen upon us.

vote it up!

Robinho goes AWOL

CITY was a club in turmoil today after star striker Robinho went AWOL and the much heralded world record £100m bid for Kaka collapsed.

Executive chairman Garry Cook was in urgent contact with manager Mark Hughes at the squad's Tenerife training camp desperately trying to find out the whereabouts of the £32.5m Brazilian international.

Cook said he has no idea why Robinho has walked out.

City officials are refusing to say whether Robinho stormed out, or that he has returned home to South America.

>>MEN.


Full details are a little sketchy at the moment as to exactly what has happened and why, but it does (thankfully) not seem to be linked to the failed pursuit of Kaka.


Closer to the truth is probably the report that he was unhappy at not being allowed to return to Brazil this week (when we don't have a game).


Brazilians going AWOL is not a new development in football, with countless episodes littering football history and the hope here is that it is no more than a storm in a teacup and matters return to normal rather than take a turn for the worse.


UPDATE 13:45 - The BBC are quoting Robinho, who says the club were fully aware all along:

"I had made Manchester City aware that I needed to return to Brazil because of a family matter," Robinho said.

"I will return to the club and hope to sort out this matter as soon as possible," added the 24-year-old."
I'm not sure it fully answers the questions though, but it's a start at least.

vote it up!

The days best City links 01/20/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

vote it up!

Monday, January 19, 2009

Kaka move called off

Manchester City has terminated its discussions with AC Milan over the possible transfer of the player Kaka.

Following a meeting in Milan today, the Club felt that it was unlikely that the two parties could reach common ground for an agreement.

The discussions reached only a preliminary stage and the player was not involved at any time. No commercial terms were framed.

Commenting on the situation, Garry Cook stated: "Whilst Manchester City Football Club has an obvious interest in world class players of the quality of Kaka, we owe it to our fans that such a transfer must work on every level; commercially, financially, in terms of results on the field and within Manchester City's broader community."
>>mcfc.co.uk

Breaking news of sorts as although talks were being held in Milan, there was no further announcement expected during the early part of this week.

It is a strange statement from the club, not giving much away in terms of why the pursuit has been terminated, and not much from Milan either, with the exception of Silvio Berlusconi himself commenting:
"It was my intervention but also his," Berlusconi said. "When I heard he preferred to stay, that he hadn't thought about losing a chance for a higher salary and that he put the values of the club, friendship and fans affection above all else, I said, 'Come on,' and we hugged."
Perhaps last weekends piece in The Observer wasn't so far fetched after all.

I'm sure there will be much more to come from this story over the next twenty four hours or so.

vote it up!

The days best City links 01/19/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

vote it up!